Friday Facebook announce It will suspend former President Donald Trump from the social network for two years, until at least January 7, 2023, and said he will “not be reinstated unless circumstances permit.”
The ad comes in response to Last month’s recommendations From Facebook’s recently created Supervisory Board. Facebook had hoped the board of directors would decide how to handle Trump’s account, but while it backed the company’s initial decision to ban Trump from the platform for inciting violence on January 6, it returned the long-term decision to Palo Alto executives.
The news that Trump has been banned from Facebook for another 19 months was intended to provide some answers about the platform’s relationship with the former president – but instead leaves many open questions.
Who is supposed to satisfy this decision?
Although the ad provides some actual rules about how politicians use Facebook – and some guidance on how to enforce those rules – a decision to ban Trump for at least two years will not be the most popular. Advocacy groups such as Ultraviolet and Media Matters, which have long pushed Facebook to ban Trump, have issued statements saying anything less than a permanent ban is not enough. Meanwhile, people who feel any law enforcement against conservative politicians is so هو Evidence of anti-compatibility bias continue to feel this way, even though there is plenty of evidence that The opposite is true. And he leaves open the possibility of Trump returning online in time for the 2024 election cycle.
What does “worthiness” mean now?
Several platforms, including Facebook, have used the “news importance” exception to avoid imposing their own rules against politicians and world leaders. Facebook’s announcement comes with some changes in how this vulnerability will be used in the future. First, Facebook said, it will post a notification when it applies the rule to an account. And second, it “would not treat content posted by politicians differently from content posted by anyone else,” when applying the rule, which essentially means that determining whether the public interest of content that breaks the rules outweighs the potential harm of keeping online.